{"entities":{"Q1940125":{"pageid":1950867,"ns":120,"title":"Item:Q1940125","lastrevid":78031538,"modified":"2026-05-06T10:37:19Z","type":"item","id":"Q1940125","labels":{"en":{"language":"en","value":"Estimating maxima of generalized cross ambiguity functions, and uncertainty principles"}},"descriptions":{"en":{"language":"en","value":"scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6141632"}},"aliases":{},"claims":{"P31":[{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P31","hash":"fd5912e4dab4b881a8eb0eb27e7893fef55176ad","datavalue":{"value":{"entity-type":"item","numeric-id":56887,"id":"Q56887"},"type":"wikibase-entityid"},"datatype":"wikibase-item"},"type":"statement","id":"Q1940125$E95FC71C-E28B-459B-A0F6-129AB53B742C","rank":"normal"}],"P159":[{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P159","hash":"afed2185c9706b308d096baf86bcaf6aa001c5c2","datavalue":{"value":{"text":"Estimating maxima of generalized cross ambiguity functions, and uncertainty principles","language":"en"},"type":"monolingualtext"},"datatype":"monolingualtext"},"type":"statement","id":"Q1940125$B23CFDDE-5A63-4E0F-AA9F-E40696F5499F","rank":"normal"}],"P225":[{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P225","hash":"3ea86beb6bdcfd2081d5e18bae8cd8d9e7a9b3c8","datavalue":{"value":"1263.43002","type":"string"},"datatype":"external-id"},"type":"statement","id":"Q1940125$69D7080A-F92D-427A-BB50-82524A5E3527","rank":"normal"}],"P16":[{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P16","hash":"062e324f2b84cce109c1fa0b23519343df18223b","datavalue":{"value":{"entity-type":"item","numeric-id":448479,"id":"Q448479"},"type":"wikibase-entityid"},"datatype":"wikibase-item"},"type":"statement","id":"Q1940125$EC769034-BA0A-4791-99C2-53E829726DD5","rank":"normal"},{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P16","hash":"2135efbd92537da5d6f2673428f0e57677baea80","datavalue":{"value":{"entity-type":"item","numeric-id":1281262,"id":"Q1281262"},"type":"wikibase-entityid"},"datatype":"wikibase-item"},"type":"statement","id":"Q1940125$B6F418EE-F626-4711-A1C8-7F51CBBDFDE0","rank":"normal"}],"P200":[{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P200","hash":"e219ca58c5478bf431640db74af74d5c15bdb120","datavalue":{"value":{"entity-type":"item","numeric-id":107999,"id":"Q107999"},"type":"wikibase-entityid"},"datatype":"wikibase-item"},"type":"statement","id":"Q1940125$49E1918A-9045-4B95-94E9-69630C477FA2","rank":"normal"}],"P28":[{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P28","hash":"ad91c86c31fb779a94186ba52d8d9ee15f95f0e8","datavalue":{"value":{"time":"+2013-03-05T00:00:00Z","timezone":0,"before":0,"after":0,"precision":11,"calendarmodel":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1985727"},"type":"time"},"datatype":"time"},"type":"statement","id":"Q1940125$9677E34D-A9C7-47D4-9458-29A12EC4F655","rank":"normal"}],"P1448":[{"mainsnak":{"snaktype":"value","property":"P1448","hash":"a123c4c8c7c59cc53b45b78f45930baf48bad376","datavalue":{"value":"Motivated by the examples of radar cross ambiguity and wideband ambiguity functions, a generalized cross ambiguity function is defined as follows. Let \\(S\\subset\\mathbb{R}^s\\) for some \\(s\\geq 1\\), \\(X\\) a Hilbert space, and let \\(\\{U(t), t\\in S\\}\\), be a family of unitary operators depending weakly continuously on \\(t\\) and such that \\(U(t_0)=I\\) for some specific \\(t_0\\in S\\). The generalized cross ambiguity function mapping \\(A:X\\times X\\to \\mathcal{C}(S)\\) is defined as \\(A(f,g)(t)=\\langle f,\\, U(t)^\\ast g\\rangle\\). As is the case of radar ambiguity, certain parameter estimation problems can be framed in terms of maximization of \\(A(f,g)\\) for specific \\(f,g\\). Given \\(F\\in X\\) and \\(g=U(t_d)F\\) for some fixed \\(t_d\\in S\\), the unitarity of \\(U\\) gives \\(A(f,G)(t_d)=\\langle f,\\, F\\rangle\\) and the quantity \\(\\Re A(f,G)(t)\\) has a maximum value \\(\\|F\\|^2\\) at \\(t_d\\). Given \\(t=(t_1,\\dotsc, t_s)\\in S\\) and \\(1\\leq j\\leq s\\), one defines possibly unbounded skew-adjoint operators \\(T_j: \\mathcal{D}(T_j(t))\\to X\\) by \\(\\frac{\\partial}{\\partial t_j}A(f,g)(t)=-\\langle f, T_j(t) g\\rangle\\) or, with suitable constraints, \\(\\frac{\\partial}{\\partial t_j} U(t) f=U(t) T_j(t) f\\) and with \\(F,G\\) as above, \\[ \\Re A\\Bigl(\\frac{\\partial}{\\partial t_j}(T_k (t_d) F),G\\Bigr)(t_d)=0=\\Re A\\Bigl(\\frac{\\partial}{\\partial t_j}(T_k (t_d) F),F\\Bigr)=0\\, . \\] It is proved that optimization properties are preserved under suitably defined differentiable mappings. It is also proved that, if there exist \\(F_N\\) and \\(G_N\\) converging to \\(F\\) and \\(G\\), respectively, then the \\(t_d^N\\) that maximize \\(A(F_N,G_N)(t_d^N)\\) converge to \\(t_d\\) that optimizes \\(A(F,G)\\). It is illustrated how this approach provides a practical means of approximating \\(t_d\\) in the case of radar and wide-band ambiguity functions for band-limited signals. The following inequality is established. Define a matrix \\(B=B(F)\\) by \\(B_{jk}=\\Re \\langle T_j(t_d) F, T_k(t_d)F\\rangle\\) where \\(F\\in\\mathcal{D} (T_j(t_d))\\), \\(j=1,\\dotsc, s\\). Also let \\(\\lambda_j=\\langle T_j,F\\rangle/\\|F\\|^2\\) and \\(C\\) denote the matrix \\(C_{jk}=\\Re \\langle T_j(t_d)F-\\lambda_jF,\\, T_k(t_d)F-\\lambda_k F\\rangle\\). For a positive semidefinite matrix \\(M\\) and \\(c>0\\), define \\(E_M(c)=\\{x\\in\\mathbb{R}^s: x^TMx