Publication:2406555: Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2406555
Created automatically from import240129110113
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 20:32, 2 February 2024

DOI10.1515/TMJ-2017-0100zbMATH Open1437.18006arXiv1610.07281OpenAlexW2995135538WikidataQ56687295 ScholiaQ56687295MaRDI QIDQ2406555FDOQ2406555

Ross H. Street

Publication date: 5 October 2017

Published in: Tbilisi Mathematical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Distributive laws between two monads in a 2-category CK, as defined by Jon Beck in the case CK=mathrmCat, were pointed out by the author to be monads in a 2-category mathrmMndCK of monads. Steve Lack and the author defined wreaths to be monads in a 2-category mathrmEMCK of monads with different 2-cells from mathrmMndCK. Mixed distributive laws were also considered by Jon Beck, Mike Barr and, later, various others, they are comonads in mathrmMndCK. Actually, as pointed out by John Power and Hiroshi Watanabe, there are a number of dual possibilities for mixed distributive laws. It is natural then to consider mixed wreaths as we do in this article, they are comonads in mathrmEMCK. There are also mixed opwreaths: comonoids in the Kleisli construction completion mathrmKlCK of CK. The main example studied here arises from a twisted coaction of a bimonoid on a monoid. Corresponding to the wreath product on the mixed side is wreath convolution, which is composition in a Kleisli-like construction. Walter Moreira's Heisenberg product of linear endomorphisms on a Hopf algebra, is an example of such convolution, actually involving merely a mixed distributive law. Monoidality of the Kleisli-like construction is also discussed.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07281





Cites Work


Cited In (7)


Recommendations





This page was built for publication: Wreaths, mixed wreaths and twisted coactions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2406555)