Rough maximal functions and rough singular integral operators applied to integrable radial functions (Q1364615): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set profile property. |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Andreas Seeger / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Andreas Seeger / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 03:05, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Rough maximal functions and rough singular integral operators applied to integrable radial functions |
scientific article |
Statements
Rough maximal functions and rough singular integral operators applied to integrable radial functions (English)
0 references
8 February 1998
0 references
Consider the maximal operator \[ M_\Omega f(x)= \sup_{R>0} R^{-n}\int|\Omega(y') f(x-y)|dy \] and the singular integral operator \[ T_\Omega f(x)= \int\Omega(y')|y|^{-n} f(x-y)dy, \] where \(\Omega\in L^1(S^{n-1})\) is extended to a function homogeneous of degree 0; in the definition of \(T_\Omega\) one assumes cancellation: \(\int\Omega(y') d\sigma(y')=0\). It is an open question whether \(M_\Omega\) (or \(T_\Omega\) for odd \(\Omega\)) is of weak type (1,1) although this has been proved under the stronger assumption \(\Omega\in L\log L\). In this interesting paper, the authors prove that \(M_\Omega\) and \(T_\Omega\) are of weak (1,1) on \textit{radial} functions in \(\mathbb{R}^n\), where \(\Omega\) is merely assumed to be in \(L^1(S^{n-1})\). The assumption that \(\Omega\) be odd is not needed in the result for radial functions. The authors also prove the almost everywhere existence of the principal value integral, for radial \(f\in L^1\) by establishing the weak-type (1,1) estimate for the corresponding maximal singular integral (the corresponding question for general \(f\) seems to be open even under the assumption \(\Omega\in L^\infty\)). The proof is quite delicate; it partially relies on methods developed by the authors in a previous paper [Isr. J. Math. 95, 211-229 (1996)].
0 references
maximal operator
0 references
singular integral operator
0 references
weak type (1,1)
0 references