The McKinsey axiom is not canonical (Q3984429): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2274699 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2109023621 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Normal forms in modal logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some kinds of modal completeness / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An incompleteness theorem in modal logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A new proof of Sahlqvist's theorem on modal definability and completeness / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I Normal Modal Propositional Calculi / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Solution to a completeness problem of Lemmon and Scott / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An incomplete logic containing S4 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:07, 15 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The McKinsey axiom is not canonical
scientific article

    Statements

    The McKinsey axiom is not canonical (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 June 1992
    0 references
    0 references
    Kripke frames
    0 references
    KM
    0 references
    normal modal logic
    0 references
    McKinsey axiom
    0 references
    canonical frame
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references