Can nonlocal Dirac operators be topologically proper? (Q1594730): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: hep-lat/0008010 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The index of elliptic operators. IV, V / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A construction of lattice chiral gauge theories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Locality properties of Neuberger's lattice Dirac operator / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Algebraic generalization of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation. / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 12:51, 3 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Can nonlocal Dirac operators be topologically proper? |
scientific article |
Statements
Can nonlocal Dirac operators be topologically proper? (English)
0 references
6 February 2001
0 references
lattice Dirac operator
0 references
Atiyah-Singer index theorem
0 references
nonzero topological-charge gauge backgrounds
0 references