The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof (Q1934669): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A quadratic programming model for product configuration optimization / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bilateral comparisons and consistent fair division rules in the context of bankruptcy problems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:15, 6 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof
scientific article

    Statements

    The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 January 2013
    0 references
    0 references
    conflicting claims
    0 references
    division rules
    0 references
    consistency
    0 references
    consistent extension
    0 references
    claims-truncated proportional rule
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references