Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? (Q745860): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Property / DOI | |||
| Property / DOI: 10.1007/s11004-013-9492-z / rank | |||
| Property / DOI | |||
| Property / DOI: 10.1007/S11004-013-9492-Z / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 02:55, 10 December 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? |
scientific article |
Statements
Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? (English)
0 references
14 October 2015
0 references
multiple-point simulation
0 references
stationarity
0 references
ergodicity
0 references
integral range
0 references
