Latest revision as of 15:06, 7 November 2022

PARTITIONED COUPLING FOR SOLVING STOKES-DARCY SYSTEMS

Problem Statement

Instationary, coupled Stokes-Darcy two-domain problem: coupled systems of free flow adjacent to permeable (porous) media

Object of Research and Objective

The motivation for this is to avoid problems when using simple direct solvers (sparse direct solvers for the (linearized) subproblems): bad parallel scaling, untrustworthy solution with bad conditioning. This is part of the comparison to monolithic block preconditioning approach

Procedure

Splitting the problem into two subproblems (into free flow and porous media flow) and coupling (with DuMux and preCICE): use of specialized solvers for the subdomains, coupling with preCICE.

https://i.imgur.com/BFmhwG0.jpg

Involved Disciplines

Environmental Systems, Mathematics

Data Streams

Model

Stokes flow in the free-flow domain Darcy’s law for the porous domain

Discretization

Time: first-order backward Euler scheme
Space: finite volumes
- Porous Domain (Darcy): mit two-point flux approximation for pressure
- Free Flow domain (Stokes): staggered grid for pressure and velocity, upwind scheme for approximation of fluxes

Variables

Name	Unit	Symbol
Pressure (Dirichlet pressure)	-	$p$
Velocity (Neumann velocity)	-	$v$

Process Information

Process Steps

Name	Description	Input	Output	Method	Parameter	Environment	Mathematical Area
Solving	Numerical Solution of the Problem	LGS; $S^{f f}$ : $v^{p m} * n$ ; $S^{p m}$ : $p^{f f}$		Solver (UMFPACK, PD-GMRS, Bi-CGSTAB), Preconditioner (Uzawa, AMG), Coupling (preCICE, Picard iteration; inverse least-squares interface quasi-Newton)		DuMux, preCICE, DUNE	Numerical Mathematics

Applied Methods

ID	Name	Process Step	Parameter
wikidata:Q7001954	Dirichlet-Neumann coupling	Coupling
wikidata:Q1683631	Picard iteration mit fixed-point iteration	Coupling
wikidata:Q25098909	inverse least-squares interface quasi-Newton	Coupling
wikidata:Q1069090	block-Gauss-Seidel method	Preconditioner
wikidata:Q2467290	Umfpack	Solver
wikidata:Q56564057	PD-GMRES	Solver	k (subiteration parameter, determined automatically), tolerance: relative residual...
wikidata:Q56560244	Bi-CGSTAB	Solver	tolerance: relative residual...
wikidata:Q1471828	AMG method	Preconditioner
wikidata: Q17144437	Uzawa-iterations	Preconditioner
wikidata:Q1654069	ILU(0) factorization	Preconditioner

Software used

ID	Name	Description	Version	Programming Language	Dependencies	Versioned	Published	Documented
sw:8713	preCICE	Library for coupling simulations	v2104.0	Core library in C++; Bindings for Fortran, Python, C, Matlab; Adaptors dependant on simulation code (Fortran, Python, C, Matlab)	Linux, Boost, MPI, ...	https://github.com/precice/precice	https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-2125	https://precice.org/docs.html
sw:14293	DuMux	DUNE for Multi-{Phase, Component, Scale, Physics, …} flow and transport in porous media		C++, python-bindings, utility-skripts in python	Linux, DuNE (C++ Framework), cmake (module chains), package-config, compiler, build-essentials, dpg	https://git.iws.uni-stuttgart.de/dumux-repositories/dumux	https://zenodo.org/record/5152939#.YQva944zY2w	https://dumux.org/docs/
sw:18749	ISTL	Iterative Solver Template Library” (ISTL) which is part of the “Distributed and Unified Numerics Environment” (DUNE).		C++	Linux, DuNE (C++ Framework)	https://gitlab.dune-project.org/core/dune-istl	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75755-9_82	https://www.dune-project.org/modules/dune-istl/

Hardware

ID	Name	Processor	Compiler	#Nodes	#Cores
		AMD EPYC 7551P CPU		1	1

Input Data

ID	Name	Size	Data Structure	Format Representation	Format Exchange	Binary/Text	Proprietary	To Publish	To Archive
	LGS	O( $2 * 1 0^{6}$ ) Matrix size	Data structure in DUNE/DuMux			numbers	open	?	?

Output Data

ID	Name	Size	Data Structure	Format Representation	Format Exchange	Binary/Text	Proprietary	To Publish	To Archive
	Solution Vector		Data Structure in DUNE/DuMux			numbers	open	?	?
	Runtime Behavior		Data Structure in DUNE/DuMux			numbers	open	?	?
wikidata:Q18812775	vtk-image files, from the daten structure	?		ASCII or binary	open	?	?

Reproducibility

Mathematical Reproducibility

Yes, by all parameters

Runtime Reproducibility

Yes, for same input samples

Reproducibility of Results

Due to floating point arithmetic, no bitwise reproducibility

Reproducibility on original Hardware

Reproducibility on other Hardware

a) Serial Computation

b) Parallel Computation

Transferability to

a) similar model parameters (other initial and boundary values)

b) other models

Legend

The following abbreviations are used in the document to indicate/resolve IDs:

doi: DOI / https://dx.doi.org/

sw: swMATH / https://swmath.org/software/

wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 The motivation for this is to avoid problems when using simple direct solvers (sparse direct solvers for the (linearized) subproblems): bad parallel scaling, untrustworthy solution with bad conditioning.
+This is part of the  [[COMPARING_PARTITIONED_COUPLING_VS._MONOLITHIC_BLOCK_PRECONDITIONING_FOR_SOLVING_STOKES-DARCY_SYSTEMS | comparison to monolithic block preconditioning approach]]
 === Procedure ===
@@ Line 36: / Line 37: @@
 === Variables ===
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 ! Name
 ! Unit
@@ Line 54: / Line 55: @@
 === Process Steps ===
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 ! Name
 ! Description
@@ Line 76: / Line 77: @@
 === Applied Methods ===
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 ! ID
 ! Name
@@ Line 146: / Line 147: @@
 === Software used ===
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 ! ID
 ! Name
@@ Line 190: / Line 191: @@
 === Hardware ===
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 ! ID
 ! Name
@@ Line 208: / Line 209: @@
 === Input Data ===
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 ! ID
 ! Name
@@ Line 234: / Line 235: @@
 === Output Data ===
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 ! ID
 ! Name

PARTITIONED COUPLING FOR SOLVING STOKES-DARCY SYSTEMS: Difference between revisions