A simple proof of stability of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation (Q5956075): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200100532 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2071261369 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 20:04, 19 March 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1708437
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A simple proof of stability of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1708437

    Statements

    A simple proof of stability of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 September 2003
    0 references
    The authors prove a theorem (Theorem 1.1) on stability in \(L^1\) norm of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation. Consider the Cahn-Hilliard equation on the real line, \[ m_t = (-m_{xx}-1/2 m(1-m^2))_{xx}. \tag{1} \] Let \(\overline m_0(x)= \tanh (x/2)\) be a minimizer of the associated free energy \(F\), and let \(\overline m _a(x)=\overline m(x-a)\) be its translate by \(a\). Let \(m_0(x)\) be some function that will serve as initial data for (1), let \(m(t)\) be the solution of (1) through \(m_0(x)\), and define \(a\) by \(\int_{\mathbb R } (m_0(x)-\overline m_a(x)) dx = 0\). Suppose that \(\int_{\mathbb R }x^2(m_0(x)- \overline m_0(x))^2 dx \leq c_0\) for some positive constant \(c_0\). Then for any \(\varepsilon > 0\) there is a positive constant \(\delta=\delta(\varepsilon, c_0)\) such that if \(\int_{ \mathbb R }(m_0(x)-\overline m_0(x))^2 dx \leq \delta\), we have that \[ \|m(t)- \overline m_a \|_1 \leq c_2(1+c_1 t)^{-(5/52-\varepsilon)}, \] where \(a\) is as defined above and \(c_1\), \(c_2\) depend on \(\varepsilon\) and \(c_0\). Similar algebraic decay estimates hold for the excess free energy. The main ingredients in the dissipation-dichotomy argument are the lower bound on the dissipation rate (Lemma 1.4), the moment inequality of Theorem 1.5, the constrained uncertainty principle (1.24) and the consequences of the differential inequalities (1.30), that elegantly (since \(9/13>1/2\)) allow the authors to derive the \(L^1\) decay estimates. The paper is not self-contained and uses freely results from previous work by the authors [J. Phys. 95, 1069-1117 (1999; Zbl 0931.35174) and Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 25, 847-886 (2000; Zbl 0954.35030)]. The missing reference on p. 339 is to (1.29).
    0 references
    algebraic decay
    0 references
    constrained uncertainty principle
    0 references
    dissipation-dichotomy
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references