Adaptive control of robot manipulators with controller/update law modularity (Q1304032): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: William J. Satzer jun. / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: William J. Satzer jun. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00048-5 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2125652858 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:47, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Adaptive control of robot manipulators with controller/update law modularity |
scientific article |
Statements
Adaptive control of robot manipulators with controller/update law modularity (English)
0 references
5 October 1999
0 references
The authors develop an adaptive link position tracking controller for robotic manipulators which achieves modularity of the controller and update laws. They design a torque input control law to achieve input-to-state stability. The parameter estimation error is treated as a disturbance input to the link position tracking error dynamics. Consequently, the torque controller ensures closed-loop stability for any adaptive update law design that guarantees that the parameter estimates remain bounded. The authors then show how the design of the torque input control law provides global asymptotic link position tracking for any adaptive update law design which also satisfies the following conditions: the prediction error is square integrable, and the estimated inertia matrix is positive definite. To illustrate the advantages of their modular adaptive control design, the authors compare their proposed law using a standard least square estimator to the well-known controller of Slotine and Li using both simulation and experiments. Experimental results show improved tracking performance probably due to limited, indirect improvement in the control of transient performance.
0 references
adaptive control
0 references
parameter estimation
0 references
adaptive link position tracking
0 references
robotic manipulators
0 references
input-to-state stability
0 references
least square estimator
0 references