The BLUPs are not ''best'' when it comes to bootstrapping (Q1613021): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: bootstrap / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3959963 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4318617 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The derivation of blup, ML, REML estimation methods for generalised linear mixed models / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. With comments and a rejoinder by the author / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4863756 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:38, 4 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The BLUPs are not ''best'' when it comes to bootstrapping
scientific article

    Statements

    The BLUPs are not ''best'' when it comes to bootstrapping (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    5 September 2002
    0 references
    correlated data
    0 references
    mixed models
    0 references
    nested models
    0 references
    bootstrap
    0 references

    Identifiers