A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non‐linear FEA code (Q2745430): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1002/nme.191 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Miguel Á. Naya / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Miguel Á. Naya / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.191 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1977150075 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1002/NME.191 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:31, 19 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non‐linear FEA code
scientific article

    Statements

    A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non‐linear FEA code (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2001
    0 references
    computer-aided design
    0 references
    CAD software
    0 references
    finite element analysis
    0 references
    large displacement
    0 references
    finite rotations
    0 references
    flexible multibody dynamic analysis
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references