Classical knot and link concordance (Q1801797): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 04:44, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Classical knot and link concordance |
scientific article |
Statements
Classical knot and link concordance (English)
0 references
31 January 1995
0 references
In an earlier paper, the author combined the knot concordance invariants of Levine with those of Casson-Gordon by considering the homology of the 2-fold branched cyclic cover. This approach is generalized in the present paper by simultaneously considering all the \(q\)-fold branched cyclic covers for \(q\) a prime power. As an application, a new example is given of a link which is a fusion of a boundary link but which is not concordant to a boundary link. Editorial remark: It has been pointed out by Daniel Moskovich on MathOverflow, \url{https://mathoverflow.net/questions/35468/widely-accepted-mathematical-results-that-were-later-shown-to-be-wrong/36097#36097}, that the proof of Theorem 1 of this paper contains a gap, as shown by S. Friedl in his PhD-Thesis (cf. [\textit{S. Friedl}, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 4, 893--934 (2004; Zbl 1067.57003)]).
0 references
Casson-Gordon invariants
0 references
slice knot
0 references
knot concordance invariants
0 references
\(q\)-fold branched cyclic covers
0 references
fusion of a boundary link
0 references
concordant to a boundary link
0 references