Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all (Q1927388): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
| Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Using `bill and keep' interconnect arrangements to soften network competition / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 00:44, 6 July 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all |
scientific article |
Statements
Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all (English)
0 references
1 January 2013
0 references
telecommunications
0 references
interconnection
0 references
investments
0 references
quality
0 references
