Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger (Q1941728): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s11787-011-0036-3 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-011-0036-3 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2043827551 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2999896 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A logical account of formal argumentation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4894942 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4217280 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Modal provability foundations for argumentation networks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fibring argumentation frames / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Introducing Equational Semantics for Argumentation Networks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Logical modes of attack in argumentation networks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4570895 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Correspondences in the Theory of Aggregation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5582304 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proof theory for fuzzy logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Stroke Function in Natural Deduction / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proofs of some axioms by Stroke function / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Towards the Proof-theoretic Unification of Dung's Argumentation Framework: an Adaptive Logic Approach / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S11787-011-0036-3 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:18, 16 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
scientific article

    Statements

    Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger (English)
    0 references
    21 March 2013
    0 references
    argumentation theory
    0 references
    Peirce-Quine dagger
    0 references
    predicate argumentation
    0 references
    Boolean networks
    0 references
    resource based argumentation
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers