Integers with an average sum of digits (Q2566187): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2005.03.007 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2026243422 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q102321217 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Asymptotic Formula for the Average Sum of the Digits of Integers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sur certaines suites uniformément équiréparties modulo 1 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sur la fonction sommatoire de la fonction 'somme des chiffres' / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the arithmetic structure of the integers whose sum of digits is fixed / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2785577 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:38, 10 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Integers with an average sum of digits
scientific article

    Statements

    Integers with an average sum of digits (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 September 2005
    0 references
    Let \(s(n)\) denote the sum of digits in base \(g\). The authors prove a local limit law for this function in the following strange form. Write \(g_1=(g-1)/2\) and let \(b\) be a function such that \(b(n)=O(n^{1/4})\) and \(g_1n + b(n)\) is always integer. Then the number of integers \(n\leq x\) such that \[ s(n) = g_1 [ \log _g n] + b([ \log _g n]) \eqno{(*)} \] is \( c x ( \log _g x )^{-1/2} + O(x/ \log x )\) with a constant \(c\). They also show that for every irrational \(\alpha \) the sequence \(\alpha n\), where \(n\) runs over the integers satisfying \((*)\), is uniformly distributed modulo 1. The reviewer does not see any reason why the range of \(b\) is so restricted; one would expect a central limiting law for \(b(n) \sim t \sqrt { \log n}\) with perhaps a weaker remainder term.
    0 references
    sum of digits
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers