Quantile Judgments of Lognormal Losses: An Experimental Investigation (Q4991781): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2020.0423 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W3132977018 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3249325 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Using Experts’ Noisy Quantile Judgments to Quantify Risks: Theory and Application to Agribusiness / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Limits for the Precision and Value of Information from Dependent Sources / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantile Evaluation, Sensitivity to Bracketing, and Sharing Business Payoffs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Evaluating Quantile Assessments / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:13, 25 July 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7354949
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Quantile Judgments of Lognormal Losses: An Experimental Investigation
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7354949

    Statements

    Quantile Judgments of Lognormal Losses: An Experimental Investigation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 June 2021
    0 references
    expert elicitation
    0 references
    quantile estimates
    0 references
    sampling errors
    0 references
    judgmental biases
    0 references
    dependence
    0 references

    Identifiers