Intention is choice with commitment (Q2640592): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Towards a general theory of action and time / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4318844 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3993251 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4951952 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Intrinsic preferability and the problem of supererogation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3964033 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The hypersonic laminar boundary layer near sharp compression and expansion corners / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: First-order dynamic logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5633670 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3871917 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3992735 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:33, 21 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Intention is choice with commitment
scientific article

    Statements

    Intention is choice with commitment (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    The theory can be regarded as a specification for the design of an artificial agent. A syntax with different variables, classical junctors, ``happens'', ``done'', ``agent'', ``believe'', ``goal'', and a possible- worlds semantics are given. Properties of the models are \(\vDash (HAPPEN a;b)\equiv (HAPPEN a;(HAPPEN b)?),\quad \vDash (HAPPEN a)\equiv (HAPPEN a;(DONE a)?),\vDash \neg (LATER p)\) etc. A Hintikka-style axiom schema for BEL is assumed. The formalism captures some important properties of intention. There are given two different definitions of (INTEND xa). The analysis shows how intentions can be adopted relative to a background of beliefs and other goals.
    0 references
    0 references
    formal theory of rational action
    0 references
    planning
    0 references
    design of an artificial agent
    0 references
    syntax
    0 references
    possible-worlds semantics
    0 references
    Hintikka-style axiom schema
    0 references
    intention
    0 references

    Identifiers