Controlling recursive inference (Q1097714): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5578545 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5584402 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5721424 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On compiling queries in recursive first-order databases / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Deleting Repeated Goals in the Problem Reduction Format / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4124327 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4157922 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On recursive axioms in deductive databases / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Data independent recursion in deductive databases / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3856120 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Controlling backward inference / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Implementation of logical query languages for databases / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:41, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Controlling recursive inference
scientific article

    Statements

    Controlling recursive inference (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    Loosely speaking, recursive inference occurs when an inference procedure generates an infinite sequence of similar subgoals. In general, the control of recursive inference involves demonstrating that recursive portions of a search space will not contribute any new answers to the problem beyond a certain level. We first review a well-known syntactic method for controlling repeating inference (inference where the conjuncts processes are instances of their ancestors), provide a proof that it is correct, and discuss the conditions under which the strategy is optimal. We also derive more powerful pruning theorems for cases involving transitivity axioms and cases involving subsumed subgoals. The treatment of repeating inference is followed by consideration of the more difficult problem of recursive inference that does not repeat. Here we show how knowledge of the properties of the relations involved and knowledge about the contents of the system's database can be used to prove that portions of a search space will not contribute any new answers.
    0 references
    reasoning
    0 references
    recursive inference
    0 references
    database
    0 references

    Identifiers