Ulrich bundles on blowing up (and an erratum) (Q1690938): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2017.09.020 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.CRMA.2017.09.020 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 03:47, 11 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Ulrich bundles on blowing up (and an erratum)
scientific article

    Statements

    Ulrich bundles on blowing up (and an erratum) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 January 2018
    0 references
    The paper under review is an accompaniment to the second author's previous paper on Ulrich bundles of blowups [C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris 354, No. 12, 1215--1218 (2016; Zbl 1388.14125); erratum ibid. 355, No. 12, 1291--1297 (2017)]. The authors combine Theorem 0.1 of [loc. cit.] with \textit{I. Bauer}'s analysis of inner-projection surfaces [J. Reine Angew. Math. 460, 1--13 (1995; Zbl 0841.14041)] to prove that except possibly for some special \(K3\) surfaces, any surface of degree at least 4 in \(\mathbb{P}^4\) which results from inner projection is Ulrich-wild, i.e. admits families of non-isomorphic indecomposable Ulrich bundles having arbitrarily large dimension. They also prove that if \(\rho : \widetilde{X} \to X\) is a blowup of a smooth projective variety \(X\) at a point, \(E\) is the exceptional divisor, \(\mathcal{O}(h)\) is a very ample line bundle on \(X\) whose strict transform \(\mathcal{O}(\widetilde{h})\) via \(\rho\) is very ample, and \(\mathcal{E}\) is a vector bundle of rank \(r\) on \(\widetilde{X}\) which is Ulrich with respect to \(\mathcal{O}(\widetilde{h})\) and satisfies \(\mathcal{E} \otimes \mathcal{O}_{E} \cong \mathcal{O}_{E}(1)^{\oplus r},\) then \(\rho_{\ast}\mathcal{E}\) is a vector bundle on \(X\) which is Ulrich with respect to \(\mathcal{O}(h).\) This was erroneously stated without the hypothesis on \(\mathcal{E} \otimes \mathcal{O}_{E}\) in the aforementioned paper of the second author; examples are given in the present paper to show the hypothesis cannot be removed.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers