A Non-linear Hardening Model Based on Two Coupled Internal Hardening Variables: Formulation and Implementation (Q3407171): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:14, 24 November 2024 Tconrad (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, private, Suppressors, Administrators 2,828 edits ‎Created claim: summary (P1638): This article outlines a logically consistent proof that does not contain errors, using clear notation and definitions from differential geometry. The author's step-by-step reasoning aligns with established knowledge in relevant fields but may be challenging for readers without specific mathematical background to fully understand. There is also a risk of limitations if future discoveries challenge current understanding of quaternionic manifolds... Tag: Reverted ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 21:17, 24 November 2024 Tconrad (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, private, Suppressors, Administrators 2,828 edits ‎Removed claim: summary_simple (P1639): SIMPLE: This article discusses the proof of specific conditions involving vector fields, covariant derivatives, and metric tensors on two manifolds, \( M \) and \( N \), related through a map \( F \). The proof involves several steps that derive relationships between components of \( F \), using geometric manipulations and algebraic expressions derived from the metric tensor \( g_M \) and its associated bundles. Key conditions are expressed i... Tag: Manual revert
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / summary
	This article outlines a logically consistent proof that does not contain errors, using clear notation and definitions from differential geometry. The author's step-by-step reasoning aligns with established knowledge in relevant fields but may be challenging for readers without specific mathematical background to fully understand. There is also a risk of limitations if future discoveries challenge current understanding of quaternionic manifolds and Riemannian geometry. (English)
Property / summary: This article outlines a logically consistent proof that does not contain errors, using clear notation and definitions from differential geometry. The author's step-by-step reasoning aligns with established knowledge in relevant fields but may be challenging for readers without specific mathematical background to fully understand. There is also a risk of limitations if future discoveries challenge current understanding of quaternionic manifolds and Riemannian geometry. (English) / rank
	~~Normal rank~~