Flipping bridge surfaces and bounds on the stable bridge number (Q633885): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Normalize DOI.
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2140/AGT.2011.11.1987 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2140/AGT.2011.11.1987 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 23:09, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Flipping bridge surfaces and bounds on the stable bridge number
scientific article

    Statements

    Flipping bridge surfaces and bounds on the stable bridge number (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 August 2011
    0 references
    Let \(H\) be a compression body. A set of properly embedded arcs \(\tau\) in \(H\) is trivial if each arc is parallel to an arc in \(\partial_+ H\) or it is a vertical arc. Let \(T\) be a tangle in a compact orientable 3-manifold \(M\), that is, a collection of properly embedded arcs and circles in \(M\). Let \(\Sigma\) be a connected surface embedded in \(M\). We say that \(\Sigma\) is a bridge surface if \(\Sigma\) splits \(M\) into two compression bodies \(H^{+}\) and \(H^{-}\), it is transverse to \(T\), and \(\tau^{\pm}=H^{\pm}\cap T\) are trivial arcs in the corresponding compression body. For \(\Sigma\) a bridge surface, \(\chi(\Sigma)\) denotes the Euler characteristic of the punctured surface. In this paper the authors consider pairs of bridge splittings and want to determine bounds for a splitting that is obtained from both splittings via stabilizations and perturbations. In particular consider the splittings \((\Sigma, (H^{+},\tau^{+}),(H^{-},\tau^{-}))\) and \((\Sigma, (H^{-},\tau^{-}),(H^{+},\tau^{+}))\). Let \(\Sigma''\) be a surface that determines a splitting that is isotopic to stabilizations and perturbations of both splittings. In one of the main results of the paper, a lower bound for \(2-\chi(\Sigma'')\) is given, which depends on \(\chi(\Sigma)\) and \(d(\Sigma,T)\), the distance of \(T\) in the curve complex of \(\Sigma\). It is also shown that there exist infinitely many manifolds \(M_\alpha\) each containing a knot \(k_\alpha\), which has two bridge surfaces \(\Sigma\) and \(\Sigma'\) with \(\chi(\Sigma)=2s\) and \(\chi(\Sigma')=2s-2\), so that if \(\Sigma''\) is isotopic to stabilizations and perturbations of both surfaces, then \(\chi(\Sigma'')\leq 3s+4\). It follows also that for each \(n\geq 2\) there exists a knot \(K\) in \(S^3\) with bridge spheres \(\Sigma\) and \(\Sigma'\), with bridge numbers \(2n-1\) and \(2n\), so that a sphere that is isotopic to perturbations of both surfaces has at least \(3n-4\) bridges, i.e., for large \(n\) it requires many perturbations. These examples are analogous to the ones given by \textit{J. Hass}, \textit{A. Thompson} and \textit{W. Thurston} [Geom. Topol. 13, No. 4, 2029--2050 (2009; Zbl 1177.57018)], which are examples of Heegaard splittings that require many stabilizations to become equivalent.
    0 references
    bridge surface
    0 references
    common stabilization
    0 references
    knot distance
    0 references
    Heegaard splitting
    0 references

    Identifiers