Codes of small defect (Q676729): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Andreas Faldum / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Wolfgang Willems / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Andreas Faldum / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Wolfgang Willems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008247720662 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1519782116 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 09:06, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Codes of small defect
scientific article

    Statements

    Codes of small defect (English)
    0 references
    20 March 1997
    0 references
    The parameters of a linear code \(C\) over \(GF(q)\) are given by \([n,k,d]\), where \(n\) denotes the length, \(k\) the dimension and \(d\) the minimum distance of \(C\). The code \(C\) is called MDS, or maximum distance separable, if the minimum distance \(d\) meets the Singleton bound, i.e. \(d=n -k+1\). Unfortunately, the parameters of an MDS code are severely limited by the size of the field. Thus we look for codes which have minimum distance close to the Singleton bound. Of particular interest is the class of almost MDS codes, i.e. codes for which \(d= n-k\). We will present a condition on the minimum distance of a code to guarantee that the orthogonal code is an almost MDS code. This extends a result of Dodunekov and Landgev. Evaluation of the MacWilliams identities leads to a closed formula for the weight distribution which turns out to be completely determined for almost MDS codes up to one parameter. As a consequence we obtain surprising combinatorial relations in such codes. This leads, among other things, to an answer to a question of Assmus and Mattson on the existence of self-dual \([2d,d,d]\)-codes which have no code words of weight \(d+1\). Actually there are more codes than Assmus and Mattson expected, but the examples which we know are related to the expected ones.
    0 references
    0 references
    Steiner systems
    0 references
    maximum distance separable
    0 references
    MDS codes
    0 references
    weight distribution
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers