Unitarizability of certain series of representations (Q2266073): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claims |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: David A. jun. Vogan / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Thomas A. Farmer / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 21:49, 19 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Unitarizability of certain series of representations |
scientific article |
Statements
Unitarizability of certain series of representations (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
Reading this paper requires a significant amount of preparation. Even the expert will benefit by having at hand [V2] Representations of real reductive Lie groups [\textit{D. Vogan} (1981; Zbl 0469.22012)] and [S-V] [\textit{B. Speh} and \textit{D. Vogan}, Acta Math. 145, 227-299 (1980; Zbl 0457.22011)]. [V2] is needed as a general reference for notation, for several definitions, and for proofs of some of the results. [S-V] is needed because a conjecture is raised there, which is the main theorem in the present paper. In order to state this theorem, even in a rough way, we need some notation. Let G be a real reductive Lie group, K a maximal compact subgroup, and \(\theta\) the corresponding Cartan involution. Let \({\mathcal G}\) be the complexification of the Lie algebra of G and let \({\mathcal Q}\) be a \(\theta\)-stable parabolic subalgebra whose complex conjugate \(\bar {\mathcal Q}\) is opposite \({\mathcal Q}\). Then \(\ell ={\mathcal Q}\cap \bar {\mathcal Q}\) is a Levi factor and \({\mathcal Q}=\ell +{\mathcal U}\) where \({\mathcal U}\) is the nilradical of \({\mathcal Q}\). Define L to be the normalizer of \({\mathcal Q}\) in G. Fix a Cartan subalgebra \({\mathcal H}\subset \ell\), a weight \(\lambda\in {\mathcal H}^*\) and define \(\pi ({\mathcal U})=\sum \alpha,\) summing over the set \(\Delta\) (\({\mathcal G},{\mathcal H})\) of roots. In [S-V] a correspondence is established between irreducible (\(\ell,L\cap K)\)-modules Y with infinitesimal character \(\lambda\)-\(\rho\) (\({\mathcal U})\) and (\({\mathcal G},K)\)-modules \({\mathcal R}Y\) of infinitesimal character \(\lambda\). The theorem deals with the unitarizability of Y and \({\mathcal R}Y\). Theorem (a) If Y is unitarizable and \(Re\ll \alpha,\lambda \gg \geq 0\) for all \(\alpha \in \Delta ({\mathcal U},{\mathcal H})\) then \({\mathcal R}Y\) is unitarizable. (b) if \({\mathcal R}Y\) is unitarizable and \(Re\ll \alpha,\lambda \gg \geq 0\) and \(\ll \alpha,\lambda \gg \neq 0\) for all \(\alpha \in \Delta ({\mathcal U},{\mathcal H})\) then Y is unitarizable. The paper is nicely written and has an informative introduction.
0 references
real reductive Lie group
0 references
Cartan involution
0 references
Levi factor
0 references