multinomineq (Q42491): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
|||||||||||||||
Property / last update | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Property / last update: 22 November 2022 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier | |||||||||||||||
0.2.1 | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.1 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.1 / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
publication date: 16 May 2019
| |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier | |||||||||||||||
0.2.3 | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.3 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.3 / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
publication date: 28 February 2022
| |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier | |||||||||||||||
0.2.4 | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.4 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.4 / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
publication date: 22 August 2022
| |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier | |||||||||||||||
0.2.6 | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.6 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / software version identifier: 0.2.6 / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
publication date: 20 February 2024
| |||||||||||||||
Property / last update | |||||||||||||||
20 February 2024
| |||||||||||||||
Property / last update: 20 February 2024 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / P1457 (Deleted Property) | |||||||||||||||
Implements Gibbs sampling and Bayes factors for multinomial models with linear inequality constraints on the vector of probability parameters. As special cases, the model class includes models that predict a linear order of binomial probabilities (e.g., p[1] < p[2] < p[3] < .50) and mixture models assuming that the parameter vector p must be inside the convex hull of a finite number of predicted patterns (i.e., vertices). A formal definition of inequality-constrained multinomial models and the implemented computational methods is provided in: Heck, D.W., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2019). Multinomial models with linear inequality constraints: Overview and improvements of computational methods for Bayesian inference. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 91, 70-87. <doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2019.03.004>. Inequality-constrained multinomial models have applications in the area of judgment and decision making to fit and test random utility models (Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42–56, <doi:10.1037/a0021150>) or to perform outcome-based strategy classification to select the decision strategy that provides the best account for a vector of observed choice frequencies (Heck, D.W., Hilbig, B.E., & Moshagen, M. (2017). From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing probabilistic choice models. Cognitive Psychology, 96, 26–40. <doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.003>). Property P1457 not found, cannot determine the data type to use. | |||||||||||||||
Property / P1457 (Deleted Property): Implements Gibbs sampling and Bayes factors for multinomial models with linear inequality constraints on the vector of probability parameters. As special cases, the model class includes models that predict a linear order of binomial probabilities (e.g., p[1] < p[2] < p[3] < .50) and mixture models assuming that the parameter vector p must be inside the convex hull of a finite number of predicted patterns (i.e., vertices). A formal definition of inequality-constrained multinomial models and the implemented computational methods is provided in: Heck, D.W., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2019). Multinomial models with linear inequality constraints: Overview and improvements of computational methods for Bayesian inference. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 91, 70-87. <doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2019.03.004>. Inequality-constrained multinomial models have applications in the area of judgment and decision making to fit and test random utility models (Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42–56, <doi:10.1037/a0021150>) or to perform outcome-based strategy classification to select the decision strategy that provides the best account for a vector of observed choice frequencies (Heck, D.W., Hilbig, B.E., & Moshagen, M. (2017). From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing probabilistic choice models. Cognitive Psychology, 96, 26–40. <doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.003>). Property P1457 not found, cannot determine the data type to use. / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / author | |||||||||||||||
Property / author: Daniel W. Heck / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / copyright license | |||||||||||||||
Property / copyright license: GNU General Public License, version 3.0 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / depends on software | |||||||||||||||
Property / depends on software: R / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / depends on software: R / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
software version identifier: ≥ 4.0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports: Rcpp / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports: Rcpp / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
software version identifier: ≥ 0.12.11 | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports: parallel / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports: Rglpk / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports: quadprog / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports: coda / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports | |||||||||||||||
Property / imports: RcppXPtrUtils / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / cites work | |||||||||||||||
Property / cites work: Multinomial models with linear inequality constraints: Overview and improvements of computational methods for Bayesian inference / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / cites work | |||||||||||||||
Property / cites work: Transitivity of preferences. / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Property / cites work | |||||||||||||||
Property / cites work: From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing psychologically plausible choice models / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 15:45, 21 February 2024
Bayesian Inference for Multinomial Models with Inequality Constraints
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | multinomineq |
Bayesian Inference for Multinomial Models with Inequality Constraints |
Statements
20 February 2024
0 references
P1457 (Deleted Property)
Implements Gibbs sampling and Bayes factors for multinomial models with linear inequality constraints on the vector of probability parameters. As special cases, the model class includes models that predict a linear order of binomial probabilities (e.g., p[1] < p[2] < p[3] < .50) and mixture models assuming that the parameter vector p must be inside the convex hull of a finite number of predicted patterns (i.e., vertices). A formal definition of inequality-constrained multinomial models and the implemented computational methods is provided in: Heck, D.W., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2019). Multinomial models with linear inequality constraints: Overview and improvements of computational methods for Bayesian inference. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 91, 70-87. <doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2019.03.004>. Inequality-constrained multinomial models have applications in the area of judgment and decision making to fit and test random utility models (Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42–56, <doi:10.1037/a0021150>) or to perform outcome-based strategy classification to select the decision strategy that provides the best account for a vector of observed choice frequencies (Heck, D.W., Hilbig, B.E., & Moshagen, M. (2017). From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing probabilistic choice models. Cognitive Psychology, 96, 26–40. <doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.003>). Property P1457 not found, cannot determine the data type to use.
0 references