Urysohn universal space, its development and Hausdorff's approach (Q935253): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2008.03.020 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2072203700 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 23:20, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Urysohn universal space, its development and Hausdorff's approach
scientific article

    Statements

    Urysohn universal space, its development and Hausdorff's approach (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    6 August 2008
    0 references
    Three approaches to a direct construction of Urysohn universal space are compared, namely those of Urysohn, Hausdorff and Katětov. The focus is on Hausdorff's unpublished approach that is shown to work in a more general situation, and the following questions related to those constructions are added. {\parindent=6mm \begin{itemize}\item[1.] Katětov constructed a non-complete strongly \(\omega\)-universal and \(\omega\)-homogeneous space \(\mathcal{W}\). Can one describe such a space in terms of the space \(\mathcal{U}_\omega\)? \item[2.] Katětov proved that there is no \(\kappa\)-universal and \(\kappa\)-homogeneous space having density \(\kappa\) if \(\kappa <\kappa^{<\kappa}\). We believe that this result can be proved using \(\mathcal{U}_{\kappa}\). How do we do that? The author gives one possibility. \item[3.] V. Uspenskii used Katětov's construction for \(\kappa=\omega\) to prove universality of the group of isometries of Urysohn universal space. Is it possible to use the space \(\mathcal{U}_\kappa\) for similar results? \end{itemize}}
    0 references
    separable metric space
    0 references
    universal space
    0 references

    Identifiers