The BLUPs are not ''best'' when it comes to bootstrapping (Q1613021): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3959963 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4318617 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The derivation of blup, ML, REML estimation methods for generalised linear mixed models / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. With comments and a rejoinder by the author / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4863756 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 15:38, 4 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The BLUPs are not ''best'' when it comes to bootstrapping |
scientific article |
Statements
The BLUPs are not ''best'' when it comes to bootstrapping (English)
0 references
5 September 2002
0 references
correlated data
0 references
mixed models
0 references
nested models
0 references
bootstrap
0 references
0 references
0 references