Perfect matching for regular graphs is \(AC^ 0\)-hard for the general matching problem (Q1185245): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3852212 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Isomorphism Testing for Graphs, Semigroups, and Finite Automata are Polynomially Equivalent Problems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A taxonomy of problems with fast parallel algorithms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3684121 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4198056 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3731028 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4385522 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Subtree isomorphism is NC reducible to bipartite perfect matching / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3732972 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A fast parallel algorithm for routing in permutation networks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Matching theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Matching is as easy as matrix inversion / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:20, 15 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Perfect matching for regular graphs is \(AC^ 0\)-hard for the general matching problem
scientific article

    Statements

    Perfect matching for regular graphs is \(AC^ 0\)-hard for the general matching problem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 June 1992
    0 references
    0 references
    parallel complexity
    0 references
    Peterson's theorem
    0 references
    perfect matching
    0 references
    0 references