\(K\)-fold cross validation performance comparisons of six naive portfolio selection rules: how naive can you be and still have successful out-of-sample portfolio performance? (Q1680705): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Large deviations estimation of the windfall and shortfall probabilities for optimal diversified portfolios / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimal portfolio allocation with higher moments / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Portfolio management without probabilities or statistics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Gaussian and logistic adaptations of smoothed safety first / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Generalized Safety First and a New Twist on Portfolio Performance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Disparity, Shortfall, and Twice-Endogenous HARA Utility / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Smoothed safety first and the holding of assets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Introduction to Statistical Learning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Robust portfolio optimization with a generalized expected utility model under ambiguity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Analyzing Microarray Gene Expression Data / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Safety First and the Holding of Assets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Portfolio choice with endogenous utility: a large deviations approach. / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:22, 14 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
\(K\)-fold cross validation performance comparisons of six naive portfolio selection rules: how naive can you be and still have successful out-of-sample portfolio performance?
scientific article

    Statements

    \(K\)-fold cross validation performance comparisons of six naive portfolio selection rules: how naive can you be and still have successful out-of-sample portfolio performance? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    16 November 2017
    0 references
    naive diversification
    0 references
    optimal diversification
    0 references
    cross validation
    0 references
    portfolio choice
    0 references

    Identifiers