Modules with chain conditions for finite matrix subgroups (Q1355560): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1996.6882 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/JABR.1996.6882 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 18:38, 10 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Modules with chain conditions for finite matrix subgroups |
scientific article |
Statements
Modules with chain conditions for finite matrix subgroups (English)
0 references
9 November 1997
0 references
The author presents new ways of describing modules with maximum resp. minimum condition for finite matrix subgroups and shows that these chain conditions can be characterized by two well-known natural transformations. The first one is \(\mu\colon\text{Hom}_S(P,M)\otimes_RA\to\text{Hom}_S(P,M\otimes_R A)\) given by \(\mu(\varphi\otimes a)(x)=\varphi(x)\otimes a\) for \(\varphi\in\text{Hom}_S(P,M)\), \(a\in A\) and \(x\in P\). Here \(_SM_R\) is a bimodule and \(_SP\) and \(_RA\) are modules. Dual results are proven by studying the homomorphism \(\nu\colon c\otimes_R\text{Hom}_S(M,U)\to\text{Hom}_S(\text{Hom}_R(C,M),U)\) with \(\nu(c\otimes\varphi)(g)=\varphi(g(c))\) for \(c\in C\), \(\varphi\in\text{Hom}_S(M,U)\), and \(g\in\text{Hom}_R(C,M)\), where \(_SM_R\) is a bimodule and \(C_R\) and \(_SU\) are modules.
0 references
pure-injective modules
0 references
finite matrix subgroups
0 references
chain conditions
0 references
natural transformations
0 references