Multiple Subject Barycentric Discriminant Analysis (MUSUBADA): how to assign scans to categories without using spatial normalization (Q428279): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/cmmm/AbdiWCGDH12, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731475607626 |
||
Property / DBLP publication ID | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/cmmm/AbdiWCGDH12 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 06:27, 13 November 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Multiple Subject Barycentric Discriminant Analysis (MUSUBADA): how to assign scans to categories without using spatial normalization |
scientific article |
Statements
Multiple Subject Barycentric Discriminant Analysis (MUSUBADA): how to assign scans to categories without using spatial normalization (English)
0 references
19 June 2012
0 references
Summary: We present a new discriminant analysis (DA) method, called Multiple Subject Barycentric Discriminant Analysis (MUSUBADA), suited for analyzing fMRI data because it handles data sets with multiple participants that each provides a different number of variables (i.e., voxels) that are themselves grouped into regions of interest (ROIs). Like DA, MUSUBADA (1) assigns observations to predefined categories, (2) gives factorial maps displaying observations and categories, and (3) optimally assigns observations to categories. MUSUBADA handles cases with more variables than observations and can project portions of the data table (e.g., subtables, which can represent participants or ROIs) on the factorial maps. Therefore MUSUBADA can analyze data sets with different voxel numbers per participant and so does not require spatial normalization. MUSUBADA statistical inferences are implemented with cross-validation techniques (e.g., jackknife and bootstrap), its performance is evaluated with confusion matrices (for fixed and random models) and represented with prediction, tolerance, and confidence intervals. We present an example where we predict the image categories (houses, shoes, chairs, and human, monkey, dog, faces,) of images watched by participants whose brains were scanned. This example corresponds to a DA question in which the data table is made of subtables (one per subject) and with more variables than observations.
0 references
0 references
0 references