A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods (Q5267883): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 21:31, 8 February 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6730504
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6730504

    Statements

    A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 2017
    0 references
    0 references
    binary logistic regression
    0 references
    deciles-of-risk
    0 references
    goodness-of-fit
    0 references
    Hosmer-Lemeshow
    0 references
    partition the covariate space
    0 references
    Pigeon-Heyse
    0 references
    Tsiatis
    0 references