Tight representations of semilattices and inverse semigroups. (Q731327): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q171333 |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Xiang-Yun Xie / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 03:45, 10 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Tight representations of semilattices and inverse semigroups. |
scientific article |
Statements
Tight representations of semilattices and inverse semigroups. (English)
0 references
2 October 2009
0 references
By a Boolean inverse semigroup we mean an inverse semigroup whose semilattice is a Boolean algebra. In this paper the author studies representations of a given inverse semigroup \(S\) in a Boolean inverse semigroup which are tight in a certain well defined technical sense. These representations are supposed to preserve as much as possible any trace of Booleanness present in the semilattice of idempotents of \(S\). After observing that the Vagner-Preston representation is not tight, the author exhibits a canonical tight representation for any inverse semigroup with zero, called the regular tight representation. The author then tackles the question as to whether this representation is faithful, but it turns out that the answer is often negative. The lack of faithfulness is however completely understood as long as we restrict to continuous inverse semigroups, a class generalizing the \(E^*\)-unitaries.
0 references
semilattices of idempotents
0 references
representations of inverse semigroups
0 references
Boolean inverse semigroups
0 references
tight representations
0 references
continuous inverse semigroups
0 references
Vagner-Preston representation
0 references