Harnack inequality for hypoelliptic second order partial differential operators (Q334909): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: Alessia Elisabetta Kogoj / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Sergio Polidoro / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Lubomira G. Softova / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 18:10, 10 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Harnack inequality for hypoelliptic second order partial differential operators
scientific article

    Statements

    Harnack inequality for hypoelliptic second order partial differential operators (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1 November 2016
    0 references
    The authors consider non-negative solutions of second order hypoelliptic equations \[ {\mathcal L}u(x)=\sum_{i,j=1}^n \partial_{x_i}(a_{ij}(x)\partial_{x_j}u(x) ) + \sum_{i=1}^n b_i(x)\partial_{x_i} u(x)=0 \quad \text{ in } \Omega \] where \(\Omega\) is a bounded open subset of \(\mathbb R^n\) and \(x\) denotes the point of \(\Omega.\) For any fixed \(x_0\in \Omega, \) the authors prove a Harnack inequality of the type \[ \sup_K u\leq C_K u(x_0)\qquad \forall \;u \quad \text{ s.t. } \;{\mathcal L} u=0, \;u\geq 0, \] where \(K\) is any compact subset of the interior of the \({\mathcal L}\)-propagation set of \(x_0\) and the constant \(C_K\) does not depend on \(u.\)
    0 references
    Harnack inequality
    0 references
    hypoelliptic operators
    0 references
    potential theory
    0 references

    Identifiers