A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods (Q5267883): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claims |
Changed an Item |
||
| Property / author | |||
| Property / author: David W. jun. Hosmer / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / author | |||
| Property / author: Stephen Quinn / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 23:11, 21 February 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6730504
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6730504 |
Statements
A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods (English)
0 references
13 June 2017
0 references
binary logistic regression
0 references
deciles-of-risk
0 references
goodness-of-fit
0 references
Hosmer-Lemeshow
0 references
partition the covariate space
0 references
Pigeon-Heyse
0 references
Tsiatis
0 references
