Zeros of Abelian integrals for a quartic Hamiltonian with figure-of-eight loop through a nilpotent saddle (Q900637): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q1078942 |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Lincheng Zhao / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 05:12, 22 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Zeros of Abelian integrals for a quartic Hamiltonian with figure-of-eight loop through a nilpotent saddle |
scientific article |
Statements
Zeros of Abelian integrals for a quartic Hamiltonian with figure-of-eight loop through a nilpotent saddle (English)
0 references
22 December 2015
0 references
Consider the perturbed polynomial system \[ \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial y} + \varepsilon f(x,y),\quad \frac{dy}{dt}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial x} + \varepsilon g(x,y) , \] where \(H(x,y)\) is a polynomial function of degree \(m+1\), \(f(x,y)\) and \(g(x,y)\) are polynomial functions of degree \(n\), and \(\varepsilon\) is a small parameter. Suppose that for \(\varepsilon =0\), the system has a family of closed orbits \(\Gamma_{h}\) define by \(H(x,y)=h\). Let \(Z(m,n)\) be the least upper bound for the number of isolated zeros of the abelian integral \[ I(h) = \oint_{\Gamma_{h}}^{} g(x,y) dx -f(x,y) dy . \] The weakened Hilbert's 16th problem is to find \(Z(m,n)\) in terms of \(m\) and \(n\). There are many results for certain values of \(m\) and \(n\). The authors consider the Hamiltonian \[ H(x,y) = -x^{2} +x^{4} + y^{4} + r\,x^{2}y^{2},\,\,r \geq 0, r\neq 2. \] The unperturbed system has three singular points \[ S(0,0),C_{1} (-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}), C_{2}(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2},0). \] The period annulus around \(C_{1}\) (\(C_{2}\)) is denoted by \(\Gamma_{h}^{L}\) (\(\Gamma_{h}^{R}\)). Let \(B_{1}(n)\) be the value of \(Z\) corresponding to \(\Gamma_{h}^{L}\) or \(\Gamma_{h}^{R}\). Let \(B_{2}\) be the value of \(Z\) corresponding to the unbounded period annulus. Using a known procedure, the authors prove that \[ \begin{aligned} B_{1} (n) &\leq 40n +6 \left[ \frac{n-1}{4} \right] + 6 \left[ \frac{n-2}{4} \right] + 11,\\ B_{2}(n) &\leq 3n + 3 \left[ \frac{n-1}{4} \right] + 13.\end{aligned} \]
0 references
abelian integral
0 references
weakened Hilbert's 16th problem
0 references
Picards-Fuchs equation
0 references
Chebyshev space
0 references