Logic-based ontology comparison and module extraction, with an application to DL-Lite (Q622105): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / describes a project that uses | |||
Property / describes a project that uses: Quaffle / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 13:38, 28 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Logic-based ontology comparison and module extraction, with an application to DL-Lite |
scientific article |
Statements
Logic-based ontology comparison and module extraction, with an application to DL-Lite (English)
0 references
31 January 2011
0 references
The paper, which is an extended version of two previous papers, gives formalizations of five variants of \(\Sigma\)-difference, \(\Sigma\)-entailment and \(\Sigma\)-inseparability and analyzes a framework for signature-based notions of difference, entailment and inseparability between ontologies in the description logics DL-Lite. These notions can be used to compare two versions of an ontology, to check whether importing one ontology into another has (possibly unwanted) side-effects, and to study and define refinements of a given ontology. It is demonstrated that \(\Sigma\)-inseparability can be used as a framework for both module extraction and forgetting. In addition, the computational complexity of deciding our \(\Sigma\)-entailment relations between DL-Lite ontologies is studied and the corresponding decision algorithms are presented. Finally, experimental results of using QBF solvers to decide \(\Sigma\)-inseparability and extract (minimal) modules are given together with a discussion of problems that remain unsolved.
0 references
description logic
0 references
ontology
0 references
module extraction
0 references
entailment
0 references
computational complexity
0 references
uniform interpolation
0 references