Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability (Q1107661): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 02:13, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability
scientific article

    Statements

    Positive analytic capacity but zero Buffon needle probability (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    One of Vitushkin's famous questions is whether the analytic capacity \(\gamma\) (\(\cdot)\) and the Buffon length Bu(\(\cdot)\) have the same null sets. (The Buffon length of a planar set E is the average length of the orthogonal projection of E (averaging over all possible directions)). \textit{P. Mattila} proved that the answer to this question is no [Ann. Math., II. Ser. 123, 303-309 (1986; Zbl 0589.28006)]. However, Mattila's argument did not give which of the implications \[ 1)\quad \gamma (E)=0\quad \Rightarrow \quad Bu(E)=0,\quad 2)\quad Bu(E)=0\quad \Rightarrow \quad \gamma (E)=0 \] are false. In this paper an explicit construction is given of a set \(E_ 0\) such that \(\gamma (E_ 0)=1\) and \(Bu(E_ 0)=0\). \(E_ 0\) is a ``crank'', i.e. a limit of certain families of line segments parallel to the x-axis.
    0 references
    analytic capacity
    0 references
    Buffon length
    0 references
    null sets
    0 references
    crank
    0 references

    Identifiers