Fields of moduli and fields of definition of odd signature curves (Q1930886): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 05:16, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Fields of moduli and fields of definition of odd signature curves
scientific article

    Statements

    Fields of moduli and fields of definition of odd signature curves (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 January 2013
    0 references
    This paper deals with the question which algebraic curves can be defined over their field of moduli. Given an algebraic curve \(C\), its field of moduli is the intersection of all fields over which \(C\) can be defined; it is therefore the smallest possible field of definition that \(C\) could allow, but a priori \(C\) need not be defined over it. The main results in this paper are twofold. The first result uses a signature argument applied to the canonical quotient map \(C \to C / \text{Aut}(C)\). By using methods in [\textit{P. Débes} and \textit{M. Emsalem}, J. Algebra 211, 42-56 (1999; Zbl 0934.14019)], it is shown that \(C\) is defined over its field of moduli if \(C / \text{Aut}(C)\) has genus 0 and additionally one of the branch indices for this quotient map appears an odd number of times. This first result is applied to cyclic \(q\)-gonal (and in particular hyperelliptic) curves. It is used to show that if the automorphism group of such a curve is large enough, then it can be defined over its field of moduli. Additionally, some new \(q\)-gonal curves whose field of moduli is contained in \(\mathbb{R}\), but which cannot be defined over \(\mathbb{R}\), are given. This generalizes results of \textit{B. Huggins} [Math. Res. Lett. 14, No. 2, 249--262 (2007; Zbl 1126.14036)] for the hyperelliptic case. If \(C\) is a plane quartic, then the authors use the result to show that \(C\) is defined over its field of moduli as long as its automorphism group is not cyclic of order two or the Klein Viergruppe. As a second main result of the paper, they use a Weil cocycle argument to show that in the latter case, any such quartic over \(\mathbb{C}\) whose field of moduli is contained in \(\mathbb{R}\) is defined over \(\mathbb{R}\). Finally, the authors give an example of a plane quartic whose automorphism group is cyclic of order two, and which has field of moduli contained in \(\mathbb{R}\), while it cannot be defined over \(\mathbb{R}\).
    0 references
    algebraic curves
    0 references
    field of moduli
    0 references
    field of definition
    0 references

    Identifiers