Positivity and discretion of algebraic points of curves (Q1130228): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q55969540, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711234560214
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q55969540 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:15, 24 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Positivity and discretion of algebraic points of curves
scientific article

    Statements

    Positivity and discretion of algebraic points of curves (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 December 1999
    0 references
    Let \(K\) be a number field and let \(\overline K\) be its algebraic closure. Let \(X_K\) be a proper, smooth, geometrically connected curve of genus \(g\geq 2\) over \(K\) and let \(J\) be its jacobian. Let \(D_0\) be a divisor of degree \(1\) on \(X_K\) and let \(\varphi_{D_0}\) be the embedding of \(X_K\) into \(J\) defined by \(D_0\). Let \(h_{NT}(x)\) be the Néron-Tate height of a point \(x\in J(\overline K)\). Theorem 1. There exists \(\varepsilon>0\) such that \(\{P\in X(\overline K) |h_{NT}(\varphi_{D_0}(P))\leq \varepsilon\}\) is finite. This generalizes a theorem by \textit{M. Raynaud} [ Invent. Math. 71, 207-233 (1983; Zbl 0564.14020)] that the set of points \(P\in X_K(\overline K)\) such that \(\varphi_{D_0}(P)\) is torsion is finite. Raynaud's result is recaptured in theorem 1 that \(\varphi_{D_0}(P)\) being torsion is equivalent to \(h_{NT}(\varphi_{D_0}(P))=0\). Also this generalizes the works of \textit{L. Szpiro} [The Grothendieck Festschrift. III, Prog. Math. 88, 229-246 (1990; Zbl 0759.14018)] and \textit{S. Zhang} [Invent. Math. 112, No. 1, 171-193 (1993; Zbl 0795.14015)]. Theorem 2. Let \({\mathcal X}\to \text{Spec}({\mathcal O}_{{\mathcal K}})\) be a regular minimal model of a smooth geometrically connected curve \(X_K\) over \(K\) of genus \(g\geq 2\). If \(\mathcal X\) has a semi-stable reduction, then \[ (\omega_{Ar}, \omega_{Ar})_{Ar}\geq (\omega_a, \omega_a)_a>0. \] Here \((\;,\;)_{Ar}\) denotes the Arakelov intersection pairing, \(\omega_{Ar}=\overline{\omega_{\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{O}_K}}\) is an element of \(\text{Pic}_{Ar}(\mathcal X)\), and \((\;,\;)_a\) is the Zhang intersection pairing. The proof is by indirect method, namely, assuming \((\omega_a, \omega_a)=0\) and \(D_0={\Omega_X^1}/{2g-2}\), one leads to a contraction. This generalizes the results of \textit{S. Zhang} (loc. cit.), \textit{J.-F. Burnol} [Invent. Math. 107, No. 2, 421-432 (1992; Zbl 0723.14019)], and \textit{S. Zhang} [J. Algebr. Geom. 4, No. 2, 281-300 (1995; Zbl 0861.14019)].
    0 references
    0 references
    curves
    0 references
    jacobian
    0 references
    Néron-Tate height
    0 references
    Arakelov intersection pairing
    0 references
    Zhang intersection pairing
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references