Publication:137134: Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:137134
Created automatically from import240129110113 |
EloiFerrer (talk | contribs) m EloiFerrer moved page Quantum solution to the Newcomb's paradox to Quantum solution to the Newcomb's paradox: Duplicate |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 09:50, 26 April 2024
DOI10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0202074zbMath1070.81027arXivquant-ph/0202074WikidataQ56095339 ScholiaQ56095339MaRDI QIDQ137134
E. W. Piotrowski, J. Sladkowski, Edward W. Piotrowski
Publication date: 13 February 2002
Published in: International Journal of Quantum Information (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0202074
Game theory (91A99) Quantum computation (81P68) Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20)
Related Items (10)
Application of quantum master equation for long-term prognosis of asset-prices ⋮ Study on the exit strategy selection mechanism of venture capital based on quantum game ⋮ Schrödinger type equation for subjective identification of supply and demand ⋮ Cooperative quantum Parrondo's games ⋮ A subjective supply–demand model: the maximum Boltzmann/Shannon entropy solution ⋮ New phenomenons induced by quantum discord and the initial state parameter in the quantum Stackelberg duopoly game ⋮ QUANTUM COMPUTER: AN APPLIANCE FOR PLAYING MARKET GAMES ⋮ The Blackwell and Dubins theorem and Rényi's amount of information measure: Some applications ⋮ Quantization of games: towards quantum artificial intelligence ⋮ QGameTheory
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Quantum strategies
- An invitation to quantum game theory
- Trading by quantum rules: quantum anthropic principle
- Quantum bargaining games
- Quantum market games
- Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies
- Evolutionarily stable strategies in quantum games
- Entanglement and dynamic stability of Nash equilibria in a symmetric quantum game
- Darwinism in quantum systems?
This page was built for publication: Quantum solution to the Newcomb's paradox