Publication:260396: Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:260396
Created automatically from import240129110113
 
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 11:23, 29 April 2024

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-74915-8_29zbMath1336.68084arXiv1204.5508OpenAlexW2276406710MaRDI QIDQ260396

F. Blanchet-Sadri, M. Dambrine

Publication date: 21 March 2016

Published in: Computational Complexity, Computer Science Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Existing definitions of the relativizations of NCOne, L and NL do not preserve the inclusions $NCOne subseteq L$, $NLsubseteq ACOne$. We start by giving the first definitions that preserve them. Here for L and NL we define their relativizations using Wilson's stack oracle model, but limit the height of the stack to a constant (instead of $log(n)$). We show that the collapse of any two classes in ${ACZm, TCZ, NCOne, L, NL}$ implies the collapse of their relativizations. Next we exhibit an oracle $alpha$ that makes $ACk(alpha)$ a proper hierarchy. This strengthens and clarifies the separations of the relativized theories in [Takeuti, 1995]. The idea is that a circuit whose nested depth of oracle gates is bounded by $k$ cannot compute correctly the $(k+1)$ compositions of every oracle function. Finally we develop theories that characterize the relativizations of subclasses of Ptime by modifying theories previously defined by the second two authors. A function is provably total in a theory iff it is in the corresponding relativized class, and hence the oracle separations imply separations for the relativized theories.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.5508





Cites Work


Related Items (4)





This page was built for publication: Relativizing small complexity classes and their theories