Do we need the \(W^{(n>3)}\) constraints to solve the \((1,q)\) models coupled to \(2\)D gravity? (Q1967625): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Strings in less than one dimension and the generalized KdV hierarchies / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: On holomorphic factorization of WZW and coset models / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: THE ROLE OF THE CONTACT ALGEBRA IN MULTIMATRIX MODELS / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Solving topological \(2\)D quantum gravity using Ward identities. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 12:13, 29 May 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Do we need the \(W^{(n>3)}\) constraints to solve the \((1,q)\) models coupled to \(2\)D gravity? |
scientific article |
Statements
Do we need the \(W^{(n>3)}\) constraints to solve the \((1,q)\) models coupled to \(2\)D gravity? (English)
0 references
6 March 2000
0 references
