Can coverage of confidence intervals be used to judge the goodness of point estimators in finite population double sampling? (Q1582656): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: The Nonexistence of Certain Statistical Procedures in Nonparametric Problems / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: Q5819795 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: The nonexistence of \(100(1-\alpha)\%\) confidence sets of finite expected diameter in errors-in-variables and related models / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / cites work | |||
| Property / cites work: An Empirical Study of the Ratio Estimator and Estimators of its Variance / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 16:22, 30 May 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Can coverage of confidence intervals be used to judge the goodness of point estimators in finite population double sampling? |
scientific article |
Statements
Can coverage of confidence intervals be used to judge the goodness of point estimators in finite population double sampling? (English)
0 references
15 October 2000
0 references
point estimator
0 references
probability sampling plane
0 references
superpopulation model
0 references
auxiliary information
0 references
ratio estimator
0 references
