A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions (Q1109029): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Provable wellorderings of formal theories for transfinitely iterated inductive definitions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: ϱ-inaccessible ordinals, collapsing functions and a recursive notation system / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Ordinals connected with formal theories for transfinitely iterated inductive definitions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Nichtbeweisbarkeit von gewissen kombinatorischen Eigenschaften endlicher Bäume;Unprovability of certain combinatorial properties of finite trees / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 18:02, 18 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions |
scientific article |
Statements
A new system of proof-theoretic ordinal functions (English)
0 references
1986
0 references
In this paper we present a family of ordinal functions \(\psi_ v(v\leq \omega)\), which seems to provide the so far simplest method for denoting large constructive ordinals. These functions are a simplified version of the \(\theta\)-functions, but nevertheless have the same strength as those. In Section 1 we define the functions \(\psi_ v\) and prove their main properties. In Section 2 we define a primitive recursive notation system (OT,\(\prec)\) based on the functions \(\psi_ v\). This system has the great advantage that its ordering relation \(\prec\) is very simple and can be defined without reference to sets of coefficients or any similar concept. OT is introduced as a subset of a larger set T of terms, which plays an important role in Section 3. There we show that the statement \(PRWO(\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\), which says that there exist no primitive recursive infinite descending sequences in (\(\{\) \(x\in OT:\) \(x\prec \psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega}\},\prec)\), is not provable in \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\). The proof of \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\nvdash PRWO(\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\) is based on the following results of \textit{W. Buchholz} [ibid. 33, 131-155 (1987; Zbl 0636.03052)]: \(ID_{\nu}\nvdash \forall n \exists k c^ n_{\nu}(k)=0\) (\(\nu\leq \omega)\), where \(c^ n_{\nu}(k)\in T\), for all \(n,k\in {\mathbb{N}}\); and every sequence \((c^ n_{\nu}(k))_{k\in {\mathbb{N}}}\) is primitive recursive. In Section 3 we prove \(c^ n_{\nu}(k)\in OT\) and \((c^ n_{\nu}(k)\neq 0\Rightarrow c^ n_{\nu}(k+1)\prec c^ n_{\nu}(k)).\) Since for all \(\nu <\omega\) we have \(c^ n_{\nu}(k)\prec \psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega}\), it follows that PRWO \((\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\) implies \(\forall \nu <\omega \forall n \exists k c^ n_{\nu}(k)=0\). Since this can be proved in Peano Arithmetic and since \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\) is conservative over \(\cup_{\nu <\omega}ID_{\nu}\) with respect to arithmetic sentences, we obtain now \(\Pi^ 1_ 1-CA_ 0\nvdash PRWO(\psi_ 0\Omega_{\omega})\).
0 references
ordinal functions
0 references
large constructive ordinals
0 references
primitive recursive notation system
0 references
0 references
0 references