How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? (Q2655056): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Using Journal Impact Factors to Correct for the Publication Bias of Medical Studies / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some general points in estimating heterogeneity variance with the DerSimonian-Laird estimator / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Minimum Variance Estimation Without Regularity Assumptions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3750809 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Nonparametric estimation of heterogeneity variance for the standardised difference used in meta-analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Publication Bias and Meta-Analysis for 2×2 Tables: An Average Markov Chain Monte Carlo EM Algorithm / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:18, 2 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
scientific article

    Statements

    How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 January 2010
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    confidence intervals
    0 references
    efficiency
    0 references
    meta-analysis
    0 references
    random effects
    0 references
    profile likelihood
    0 references
    0 references