Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation (Q614451): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Promoting symmetric weight selection in data envelopment analysis: a penalty function approach / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:01, 3 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
scientific article

    Statements

    Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 December 2010
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    data envelopment analysis
    0 references
    cross-efficiency
    0 references
    ranking
    0 references
    0 references