How to prove impossibility under global fairness: on space complexity of self-stabilizing leader election on a population protocol model (Q692907): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Computation in networks of passively mobile finite-state sensors / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Stably computable predicates are semilinear / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Simple Population Protocol for Fast Robust Approximate Majority / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The computational power of population protocols / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3396623 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Self-stabilizing Counting in Mobile Sensor Networks with a Base Station / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 22:50, 5 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | How to prove impossibility under global fairness: on space complexity of self-stabilizing leader election on a population protocol model |
scientific article |
Statements
How to prove impossibility under global fairness: on space complexity of self-stabilizing leader election on a population protocol model (English)
0 references
6 December 2012
0 references
Population protocols is one of the distributed computing models where a number of mobile agents change their states by pairwise interactions. A self-stabilizing protocol ensures that the system converges to the desired behavior regardless its initial configuration. A leader election allows to distinguish a single agent with the final state ELECTED, the state of the other agents is NON-ELECTED. Global fairness guarantees the occurrence of any possible transition. This paper proves that under the assumption of global fairness, no protocol using only \(n-1\) states (where \(n\) is the number of agents) can solve the self-stabilizing leader election in complete interaction graphs.
0 references
distributed algorithm
0 references
leader election
0 references
population protocol
0 references
self-stabilization
0 references
global fairness
0 references