Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? (Q745860): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Geostatistics / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The necessity of a multiple-point prior model / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q2763659 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: An Information Content Measure Using Multiple-point Statistics / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4084463 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3995014 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3680652 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 21:18, 10 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? |
scientific article |
Statements
Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? (English)
0 references
14 October 2015
0 references
multiple-point simulation
0 references
stationarity
0 references
ergodicity
0 references
integral range
0 references