Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? (Q745860): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Geostatistics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The necessity of a multiple-point prior model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2763659 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Information Content Measure Using Multiple-point Statistics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4084463 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3995014 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3680652 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 21:18, 10 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model?
scientific article

    Statements

    Can a training image be a substitute for a random field model? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 October 2015
    0 references
    multiple-point simulation
    0 references
    stationarity
    0 references
    ergodicity
    0 references
    integral range
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references