Why is it hard to beat \(O(n^2)\) for longest common weakly increasing subsequence? (Q1705641): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A faster algorithm computing string edit distances / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A fast algorithm for computing a longest common increasing subsequence / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A linear space algorithm for computing a longest common increasing subsequence / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Faster algorithms for computing longest common increasing subsequences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A linear algorithm for 3-letter longest common weakly increasing subsequence / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Edit Distance Cannot Be Computed in Strongly Subquadratic Time (unless SETH is false) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5111874 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Simulating branching programs with edit distance and friends: or: a polylog shaved is a lower bound made / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Computational Complexity / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 07:45, 15 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Why is it hard to beat \(O(n^2)\) for longest common weakly increasing subsequence?
scientific article

    Statements

    Identifiers